top of page
MM / XIV
Miguel Ángel Morales Aguilar
MDY
The Mandatory
The models showcased on this site were created by me but are the property of Daho Arquitectos S.C. and Juan Pablo Herrera. The information presented on this site is solely intended to demonstrate my experience with the BIM methodology during my involvement in the MDY residential project. All materials were created specifically for the portfolio and are not derived from official documentation used on-site.
The residential project, MDY The Mandatory, is located in the southern part of Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco. The construction project was managed by Eng. Enrique Galicia, while the coordination and BIM administration were handled by DAHO Arquitectos S.C. My involvement in this project began in the summer of 2022.
My role started with generating a base survey in Revit, created after a site visit and multimedia capture with a drone. From there, the objective was to generate and review all categories of elements in Revit to ensure a comprehensive analysis for the project manager and client, thus guaranteeing a construction process free of delays.
The significant challenge in coordinating information for the MDY project lies in its scale. The full project includes three fully residential towers, each with amenities tailored to the climate and customs of the Pacific coast.
Land Survey
Using a drone during the site visit, the first step was to create a model that represented all existing structures on the property, as well as the surrounding vegetation and services. The accesses considered for this exercise were Lirios Street and Costa Rica Street. All existing elements were demolished so earthworks could take place.
Original Constructions
Revit model was used to export demolition volumes.
Structural Coordination
The “MDY The Mandatory” project consists of three residential buildings, each with distinct characteristics in terms of scale, structure, and architecture. Tower A is the largest, standing at 15 levels from its deepest basement. In comparison, the other two towers do not exceed 8 levels.
For Tower A's construction, reinforced concrete footings were designed to provide rigidity to a structure based on concrete frames, connecting columns, beams, and joists at all levels up to the roof. It's important to note that this structure is not connected to the other buildings in terms of structural integrity; they were considered separately to address potential settlement issues.
The model created for Tower A included detailed information on each element's resistance and volume for accurate quantification and analysis by management. Additionally, each concrete element was meticulously modeled with its reinforcing steel, including parameters such as kilograms per linear meter, ensuring precise quantification.
The main difference between Tower A and Tower B lies in the introduction of load-bearing walls in Tower B and a smaller separation between the joists that comprise the structure of the slabs. Tower B's foundation primarily consists of continuous footings that support the load-bearing walls.
In the structural model for Tower B, detailed reinforcing steel was also included, along with a quantification of the number of coffers required for the waffle slab or joists. With only 8 levels, Tower B does not possess the same complexity as Tower A.
Tower C has a structure very similar to Tower B, with the notable difference of a larger pool on its top level. The pool's foundation primarily rests on platforms created during the excavation, which support the walls rising from the continuous footings of Tower C.
Architecture & MEP Coordination
The complete project includes approximately 60 residences of various prototypes, which will share amenities and services such as parking, a gym, a pool, a bar, and more. Ensuring the seamless integration of the main architectural elements with these facilities is fundamental. Therefore, hydraulic, electrical, HVAC, gas, PCI (fire protection), and voice and data engineering were all modeled.
This comprehensive modeling helped us achieve harmony and coordination by considering walls, slabs, ceilings, and other architectural and structural elements. By doing so, we provided clear guidance for the installation of all these services, ensuring that potential issues were addressed during the design phase rather than arising on site. The image sets an example of how the HVAC is portrayed within the mechanical filter of Revit.
TOWER B MINI POOL
Revit Bridge
The use of Revit in all phases of the project was essential for ensuring that the final product would meet the expectations of key stakeholders. By implementing this tool, we were able to create detailed facility crossings and construction simulations. These simulations, carried out with Twinmotion software, were directly connected to Revit and applied accurate criteria regarding the construction phase parameters. This integration allowed us to visualize and address potential issues early, ensuring a smoother construction process and a successful final product.
bottom of page